Models / Qwen/ Qwen3 32B

Qwen3 32B

Qwen · released Apr 27, 2025 · Qwen/Qwen3-32B

Input: text. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsApache License 2.0
Params
32.8B
Context
131K

about 98K words of context

Our take

Written Aug 2, 2026

Qwen3 is a 32.8-billion-parameter text model released in 2025 with a permissive Apache licence. It scores highest on coding tasks among its measured skills, and hosts offer a wide range of price and speed trade-offs.

Who should pick it

Pick this for budget-conscious hosted deployment where the cheapest tier in its family keeps costs low, or for latency-sensitive workloads where one host delivers 354 tokens per second. It is also a sound choice for self-hosting or commercial products thanks to its Apache 2.0 licence. Skip it if creative writing quality is your main need, or if you need verified efficiency claims about active parameters.

The case for it

  • Strongest measured skill is coding, with an Arena Coding Elo 102.6 points above its creative-writing score.
  • Apache 2.0 licence permits commercial use, fine-tuning and redistribution.
  • Eight tracked offers span a wide speed range, from 20 to 354 tokens per second, with corresponding price trade-offs.

The case against it

  • Creative writing is its weakest measured skill, 102.6 points below its coding score and 62.8 points below its hard-prompts score.
  • Active parameter count is undisclosed, so efficiency claims remain unverified.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

2 of 5

Arena Text (overall)102nd of 143 · 1347.2

Arena Hard Prompts 100th of 143Arena Maths 79th of 139

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

2 of 5

Arena Coding99th of 143 · 1407.2

Arena Coding is the only board that has scored it for this.

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored Qwen3 32B for this. We would take the rating from Arena Agent (IPS).

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where Qwen3 32B placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 105th of 143 · 1304.6
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 102nd of 143

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model6 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 6 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
1407.2independentsource ↗
1367.4independentsource ↗
1398.7independentsource ↗
1347.2independentsource ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%
A card many people ownSpills to system RAMest

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M20.7 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Loads, but do not expect an assistant. Some of the weights sit in ordinary system memory, which is far slower than the card.

Comfortable fit

One step upFits in memory

GeForce RTX 5090 · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M20.7 / 32 GBest
Spare memory7.8 GB spare
Usable context16K of 131K
Decode speed72 tok/sest

Room to spare. 7.8 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

On a MacFits in memoryest

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M20.7 / 32 GBest
Spare memory1 GB spare
Usable context4K of 131K
Decode speed7 tok/sest

Borderline fit on an estimated size. It leaves 1 GB spare on a size we calculated rather than measured, and a 10% error either way would change the answer.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
20.7 GBest
Spills to system RAMest
Q5_K_M
24.3 GBest
Spills to system RAM
Q8_0
36.2 GBest
Too large

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 8 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.080 in / $0.28 out
Context served
131K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouter$0.080 / $0.28131Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
DeepInfrafp8$0.080 / $0.2841Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
DeepInfrafp8$0.080 / $0.2841K44 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Nebius AI Studiobasefp8$0.10 / $0.3041K25 tok/sNoNoUnknown
Nebius AI Studiofp8$0.10 / $0.3041K23 tok/sNoNoUnknown
Novita AI$0.10 / $0.4541Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
SiliconFlowfp8$0.14 / $0.57131K25 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Groq$0.29 / $0.59131K396 tok/sNoNoConfirmed

Across the 8 listings we hold: 5 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 3 do not say. 3 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouter
DeepInfrafp8
DeepInfrafp8
Nebius AI Studiobase · fp8
Nebius AI Studiofp8
Novita AI
SiliconFlowfp8
Groq

Tool calling: 5 of 8 listings say yes, 1 says no, 2 publish no parameter list. JSON output: 6 of 8 listings say yes, 2 publish no parameter list. Strict schema: 5 of 8 listings say yes, 1 says no, 2 publish no parameter list.

03

Models people weigh against Qwen3 32B

04

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1407.2 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1304.6 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1367.4 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1331.8 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1398.7 on Arena Mathsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1347.2 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline
Apr 27, 2025AnnouncedQwen3 32B announced by Qwen

Prices last checked 4d ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • 2 of 8 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 3 of 8 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsApache License 2.0, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Apache License 2.0

permissiveCommercial use allowed

Fully permissive: commercial use, redistribution, and derivatives allowed. Requires attribution and a copy of the license. Includes an express patent grant.

Identifiers

Hugging Face
Qwen/Qwen3-32B
Architecture
Dense
Modality record
text->text
Catalogue slug
qwen-qwen3-32b

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us