Models / Google/ Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Google · released Mar 11, 2026 · google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it

Input: text, images and video. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsApache License 2.0
Params
26.5B
Context
262K

4B active per word · about 197K words of context

Our take

Written Aug 2, 2026

Google's Gemma is a mid-size downloadable language model with a permissive Apache licence. It uses an efficient mixture-of-experts design that activates only a few billion parameters per token, making it the efficiency pick of the mid-size class.

Who should pick it

Make this your default local mid-size pick: measured chat quality, a permissive licence and efficient design. Use it for cheap hosted multimodal inference in our catalogue, or for edge deployment via Cloudflare Workers AI. Skip it if you need top-tier chat quality or the absolute lowest hosting count.

The case for it

  • Measured chat quality unusually close to models many times larger.
  • Apache 2.0 licence allows commercial use, fine-tuning and redistribution.
  • Only about four billion active parameters per token from a 26.5-billion total, making it efficient for local use.

The case against it

  • Trails the frontier on measured chat quality.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

3 of 5

Arena Text (overall)47th of 143 · 1438.5

Arena Hard Prompts 43rd of 143Arena Maths 25th of 139

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

3 of 5

Arena Coding50th of 143 · 1480.7

Arena Code (WebDev) 48th of 74

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored Gemma 4 26B A4B for this. We would take the rating from Arena Agent (IPS).

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where Gemma 4 26B A4B placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 50th of 143 · 1404
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 35th of 143

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model7 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 7 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
1480.7independentsource ↗
1462.7independentsource ↗
1467.5independentsource ↗
1438.5independentsource ↗
1366.6independentsource ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%

Comfortable fit

A card many people ownFits in memory

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M16.7 / 24 GBest
Spare memory3.9 GB spare
Usable context16K of 262K
Decode speed283 tok/sest

Room to spare. 3.9 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

One step upFits in memory

GeForce RTX 5090 · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M16.7 / 32 GBest
Spare memory11.9 GB spare
Usable context33K of 262K
Decode speed503 tok/sest

Room to spare. 11.9 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

On a MacFits in memory

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M16.7 / 32 GBest
Spare memory5.1 GB spare
Usable context16K of 262K
Decode speed49 tok/sest

Room to spare. 5.1 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
16.7 GBest
Fits in memory
Q5_K_M
19.6 GBest
Fits in memoryest
Q8_0
29.3 GBest
Spills to system RAMest

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 12 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.070 in / $0.34 out
Context served
262K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
Cloudflare Workers AI$0.10 / $0.30256K69 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
OpenRouter$0.070 / $0.34262Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
DeepInfrafp8$0.070 / $0.34262Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
DeepInfrafp8$0.070 / $0.34262K23 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Venice AIbf16$0.13 / $0.40256K20 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Parasailbf16$0.13 / $0.40262K25 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
NextBitbf16$0.12 / $0.40262K52 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Ionstreambf16$0.13 / $0.40262K19 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Novita AI$0.13 / $0.40262Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Novita AIbf16$0.13 / $0.40262K29 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
SiliconFlowfp8$0.12 / $0.40262K36 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Google Vertex AIglobal$0.15 / $0.60262K41 tok/sNoNoConfirmed

Across the 12 listings we hold: 9 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 3 do not say. 8 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
Cloudflare Workers AI
OpenRouter
DeepInfrafp8
DeepInfrafp8
Venice AIbf16
Parasailbf16
NextBitbf16
Ionstreambf16
Novita AI
Novita AIbf16
SiliconFlowfp8
Google Vertex AIglobal

Tool calling: 8 of 12 listings say yes, 2 say no, 2 publish no parameter list. JSON output: 10 of 12 listings say yes, 2 publish no parameter list. Strict schema: 8 of 12 listings say yes, 2 say no, 2 publish no parameter list.

03

Models people weigh against Gemma 4 26B A4B

04

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 3, 2026Price changeNextBit cut Gemma 4 26B A4B pricing by 8%input −8% ($0.13 → $0.12 per 1M tokens)
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1480.7 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1404 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1462.7 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1440.6 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1467.5 on Arena Mathsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1438.5 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1366.6 on Arena Code (WebDev)leaderboard
Jul 31, 2026Price changeNextBit cut Gemma 4 26B A4B pricing by 17%input −17% ($0.18 → $0.15 per 1M tokens); output −10% ($0.50 → $0.45 per 1M tokens)
Jul 30, 2026Price changeNextBit raised Gemma 4 26B A4B pricing by 12%input +12% ($0.16 → $0.18 per 1M tokens); output +4% ($0.48 → $0.50 per 1M tokens)

Prices last checked 5h ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • 2 of 12 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 3 of 12 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsApache License 2.0, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Apache License 2.0

permissiveCommercial use allowed

Fully permissive: commercial use, redistribution, and derivatives allowed. Requires attribution and a copy of the license. Includes an express patent grant.

Identifiers

Architecture
Mixture of experts
Modality record
text+image+video->text
Catalogue slug
google-gemma-4-26b-a4b

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us