Models / MiniMax/ MiniMax M2

MiniMax M2

MiniMax · released Oct 22, 2025 · MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2

Input: text. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsCustom licence
Params
229B
Context
205K

about 154K words of context · download allowed, licence restricts use

Our take

Written Aug 3, 2026

MiniMax M2 is a 229-billion-parameter text-only model released in 2025 with a custom restricted licence. It offers broad Arena benchmark coverage across six categories and its fastest hosting is on MiniMax's own platform, though it leads no measured category.

Who should pick it

Use this for long-context text tasks up to 204,800 tokens when the licence terms are acceptable, or when you want API access through MiniMax's own hosting for the fastest measured throughput. Skip it if you need a permissive open licence, multimodal input, or category-leading quality scores.

The case for it

  • Broad benchmark coverage with consistent tracking: six distinct Arena categories measured, with multiple dated readings showing live monitoring.
  • Fastest measured throughput on the cheapest provider: 31 tokens per second on MiniMax, against 16 on Google Vertex and 5 on one Novita offer.

The case against it

  • No quality leadership in any measured category: Arena Text overall 1345.9, Arena Coding 1384.8, Arena Hard Prompts 1368.5, Arena Maths 1354.8 — all mid-table with no wins evident.
  • Custom restricted licence, not Apache or MIT, which limits commercial freedom versus open alternatives.
  • Active parameter count undisclosed, so the true inference cost per forward pass cannot be verified.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

2 of 5

Arena Text (overall)106th of 143 · 1345.9

Arena Hard Prompts 99th of 143Arena Maths 96th of 139

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

2 of 5

Arena Coding105th of 143 · 1384.8

Arena Code (WebDev) 61st of 74

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

Scored, not ratedSWE-bench Verified · 20th of 39 · 61via mini-SWE-agent

MiniMax M2 is not on Arena Agent (IPS), which is where the rating would come from, so there is no rating here. It is on SWE-bench Verified, in 20th of 39 with 61.

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where MiniMax M2 placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 114th of 143 · 1287.3
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 101st of 143

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model8 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 8 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
1384.8independentsource ↗
1368.5independentsource ↗
1354.8independentsource ↗
1345.9independentsource ↗
1296.7independentsource ↗
61via mini-SWE-agentindependentsource ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%
A card many people ownToo large

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M144.2 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step upToo large

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M144.2 / 32 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

Comfortable fit

On a MacFits in memory

Apple M3 Ultra (80-core GPU) · 512 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M144.2 / 512 GBest
Spare memory233.8 GB spare
Usable context131K of 205K
Decode speed4 tok/sest

Room to spare. 233.8 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
144.2 GBest
Too large
Q5_K_M
169.2 GBest
Too large
Q8_0
252.7 GBest
Too large

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 5 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.26 in / $1.02 out
Context served
205K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouter$0.26 / $1.02205Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Minimaxfp8$0.26 / $1.02205K82 tok/sNoYesunknown periodConfirmed
Novita AI$0.30 / $1.20205Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Novita AIfp8$0.30 / $1.20205K45 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Google Vertex AI$0.30 / $1.20197K86 tok/sNoNoConfirmed

Across the 5 listings we hold: 3 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 2 do not say. 3 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouter
Minimaxfp8
Novita AI
Novita AIfp8
Google Vertex AI

Tool calling: 4 of 5 listings say yes, 1 publishes no parameter list. JSON output: 3 of 5 listings say yes, 1 says no, 1 publishes no parameter list. Strict schema: 2 of 5 listings say yes, 2 say no, 1 publishes no parameter list.

03

Models people weigh against MiniMax M2

04

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1384.8 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1287.3 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1368.5 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1339.1 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1354.8 on Arena Mathsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1345.9 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1296.7 on Arena Code (WebDev)leaderboard
Jul 27, 2026Benchmark updateminimax-m2 enters LMArena at 1346 Elo6861 votes
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline
Nov 24, 2025BenchmarkScored 61 via mini-SWE-agent on SWE-bench Verifiedleaderboard

Prices last checked 5d ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • 1 of 5 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 2 of 5 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsCustom licence, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Custom licence

restricted_openCustom licence — review the terms

This model ships custom license terms that don't map to a known template. We haven't parsed them, so commercial use, redistribution and derivatives are unverified — review the original terms before shipping.

Identifiers

Architecture
Mixture of experts
Modality record
text->text
Catalogue slug
minimax-minimax-m2

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us