Models / MiniMax/ MiniMax M1

MiniMax M1

MiniMax · released Jun 17, 2025 · MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M1-40k

Input: text. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsApache License 2.0
Params
Not published
Context
1M

about 750K words of context

Our take

Written Aug 3, 2026

MiniMax M1 is a downloadable text model with a one-million-token request limit and a permissive Apache licence. Its measured coding score is the strongest of its six tracked skills, while its creative-writing score lags almost a hundred points behind.

Who should pick it

Choose this for long-document processing at one million tokens, rare among downloadable models. Use it for coding tasks, where it scores highest among its own measured dimensions. Pick direct MiniMax access for the lowest input rate without third-party markup. Skip it if you need strong creative writing, consistent speed across providers, or any basis to judge hardware requirements.

The case for it

  • One-million-token request limit, extremely long among downloadable models.
  • Coding performance leads its own skill profile: a 98.6-point gap above its creative-writing score on the same evaluation framework.
  • Direct access avoids the premium charged by third-party routers.

The case against it

  • Creative writing is the weakest of its six measured skills, almost a hundred points below its coding score.
  • Throughput more than doubles between providers, so speed depends heavily on where you run it.
  • Parameter count is undisclosed, leaving no basis to judge efficiency or hardware needs.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

2 of 5

Arena Text (overall)95th of 143 · 1363.8

Arena Hard Prompts 95th of 143Arena Maths 92nd of 139

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

2.5 of 5

Arena Coding94th of 143 · 1416.1

Arena Coding is the only board that has scored it for this.

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored MiniMax M1 for this. We would take the rating from Arena Agent (IPS).

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where MiniMax M1 placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 98th of 143 · 1317.5
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 95th of 143

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model6 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 6 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
1416.1independentsource ↗
1380.9independentsource ↗
1371.3independentsource ↗
1363.8independentsource ↗
01

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 4 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.55 in / $2.20 out
Context served
1M
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouter$0.55 / $2.201Mnot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Novita AI$0.55 / $2.201Mnot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Novita AIbf16$0.55 / $2.201M71 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Minimax$0.40 / $2.201M33 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown

Across the 4 listings we hold: 2 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 2 do not say. 1 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouter
Novita AI
Novita AIbf16
Minimax

Tool calling: 2 of 4 listings say yes, 1 says no, 1 publishes no parameter list. JSON output: 0 of 4 listings say yes, 3 say no, 1 publishes no parameter list. Strict schema: 0 of 4 listings say yes, 3 say no, 1 publishes no parameter list.

02

Models people weigh against MiniMax M1

03

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1416.1 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1317.5 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1380.9 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1346.2 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1371.3 on Arena Mathsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1363.8 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline
Jun 17, 2025AnnouncedMiniMax M1 announced by MiniMax

Prices last checked 9d ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • 1 of 4 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 2 of 4 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
  • We hold no cached-input rate for any of its listings.
04

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsApache License 2.0, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Apache License 2.0

permissiveCommercial use allowed

Fully permissive: commercial use, redistribution, and derivatives allowed. Requires attribution and a copy of the license. Includes an express patent grant.

Identifiers

Modality record
text->text
Catalogue slug
minimax-minimax-m1

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us