Models / Google/ Gemma 3 12B

Gemma 3 12B

Google · released Mar 1, 2025 · google/gemma-3-12b-it

Input: text and images. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsGemma Terms of Use
Params
12.2B
Context
131K

about 98K words of context · download allowed, licence restricts use

Our take

Written Aug 3, 2026

Gemma 3 is a compact vision-language model from Google that accepts text and images and can handle up to 131,072 tokens in a single request. Its weights can be downloaded, though under terms that restrict some commercial uses, and it sits at a cheap entry point for multimodal inference.

Who should pick it

Pick this for budget image-and-text workloads where low cost matters more than licensing flexibility, or for long-context tasks needing six-figure token limits. Use it if you are already inside the Google or Gemma ecosystem. Skip it if you need to redistribute the weights, use it in ways the Gemma Terms of Use restrict, or if you need verified speed guarantees from your chosen host.

The case for it

  • Very cheap entry point for multimodal inference: the cheapest tracked offer undercuts the next one by a third on output cost.
  • 131,072-token request limit — no smaller-context variant in our data for this parameter class.
  • Consistent leaderboard presence across six task categories, with scores stable to within a point between July and August evaluations.

The case against it

  • Gemma Terms of Use restrict redistribution and certain commercial uses — not as permissive as Apache 2.0.
  • Throughput is unverified for three of four tracked hosts; only one lists a measured speed.
  • Dense 12.2-billion-parameter architecture with no disclosed active-parameter count, so no efficiency gains from a mixture-of-experts design.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

1.5 of 5

Arena Text (overall)107th of 143 · 1342

Arena Hard Prompts 112th of 143Arena Maths 106th of 139

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

1 of 5

Arena Coding127th of 143 · 1316.2

Arena Coding is the only board that has scored it for this.

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored Gemma 3 12B for this. We would take the rating from Arena Agent (IPS).

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where Gemma 3 12B placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 91st of 143 · 1333.6
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 109th of 143

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model6 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 6 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
1316.2independentsource ↗
1331.9independentsource ↗
1317.6independentsource ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%

Comfortable fit

A card many people ownFits in memory

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M7.7 / 24 GBest
Spare memory13.6 GB spare
Usable context131K of 131K
Decode speed109 tok/sest

Room to spare. 13.6 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

One step upFits in memory

GeForce RTX 5090 · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M7.7 / 32 GBest
Spare memory21.6 GB spare
Usable context131K of 131K
Decode speed194 tok/sest

Room to spare. 21.6 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

On a MacFits in memory

Apple M1 (8-core GPU) · 16 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M7.7 / 16 GBest
Spare memory2.8 GB spare
Usable context33K of 131K
Decode speed6 tok/sest

Room to spare. 2.8 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
7.7 GBest
Fits in memory
Q5_K_M
9 GBest
Fits in memory
Q8_0
13.5 GBest
Fits in memory

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 4 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.050 in / $0.10 out
Context served
131K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
Novita AI$0.050 / $0.10131Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
OpenRouter$0.050 / $0.15131Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
DeepInfrabf16$0.050 / $0.15131K45 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
DeepInfrabfloat16$0.050 / $0.15131Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown

Across the 4 listings we hold: 1 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 3 do not say. 1 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
Novita AI
OpenRouter
DeepInfrabf16
DeepInfrabfloat16

Tool calling: 2 of 4 listings say yes, 2 publish no parameter list. JSON output: 2 of 4 listings say yes, 2 publish no parameter list. Strict schema: 2 of 4 listings say yes, 2 publish no parameter list.

03

Models people weigh against Gemma 3 12B

04

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1316.2 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1333.6 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1331.9 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1321.4 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1317.6 on Arena Mathsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1342 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline
Mar 1, 2025AnnouncedGemma 3 12B announced by Google

Prices last checked 6h ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • 2 of 4 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 3 of 4 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
  • We hold no cached-input rate for any of its listings.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsGemma Terms of Use, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Gemma Terms of Use

restricted_openCommercial use allowed

Commercial use allowed, but Google's prohibited-use policy applies and can be updated over time — terms are less static than Apache/MIT.

Identifiers

Modality record
text+image->text
Catalogue slug
google-gemma-3-12b

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us