Models / Z.ai/ GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2

Z.ai · released Jun 16, 2026 · zai-org/GLM-5.2

Input: text. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsMIT License
Params
753B
Context
1M

active per word not recorded by us · about 786K words of context

Our take

Written Aug 6, 2026

Available from 30 hosted offers, this large downloadable model from Zhipu carries a permissive MIT licence and a one-million-token request limit. It is a strong choice for teams that want top-tier capability without licensing restrictions.

Who should pick it

Pick this when you need top-tier capability with a genuinely permissive licence, or for long-context workloads on a budget. Use it if you want leverage over providers: 30 offers means real price competition. Skip it if you need image, audio or video input, or if you want to self-host on a single consumer GPU.

The case for it

  • Permissive MIT licence allows commercial use, fine-tuning and redistribution.
  • 30 current hosted offers, so price competition is unusually strong.
  • One-million-token request limit matches the proprietary top-tier models.

The case against it

  • Text-only; no image, audio or video input, unlike Gemini or Claude lines.
  • Over 753.3 billion parameters puts even compressed weights beyond workstation reach.
00

How good is it?

An open-weights text model for everyday questions, drafting, coding and tool use.

Good at
  • getting answers to everyday questionsArena Text (overall) · 23rd of 168
  • drafts, rewrites and editingArena Creative Writing · 21st of 168
  • writing and completing codeArena Coding · 37th of 168
  • calling tools to carry out requestsArena Agent · Tool use · 9th of 55
  • changing course when you give new instructionsArena Agent · Steerability · 12th of 55

EverydayGeneral questions and everyday reasoning

4 of 5

Arena Text (overall)23rd of 168 · 1476

Arena Hard Prompts 27th of 168Arena Maths 20th of 163LiveBench Mathematics 30th of 58LiveBench Data Analysis 34th of 58LiveBench Reasoning 45th of 58

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

4 of 5

Arena Coding37th of 168 · 1512

Arena Code (WebDev) 18th of 95LiveBench Coding 19th of 58

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

3 of 5

Arena Agent14th of 55 · 0.04

LiveBench Agentic Coding 32nd of 58

WritingDrafting and rewriting prose

3.5 of 5

Arena Creative Writing21st of 168 · 1455

LiveBench Language 38th of 58
How it behaves in an agent loop
Tool usereaches for the right one, and does not invent one9th of 55
Steerabilitydoes what it was asked, and changes course when told12th of 55
Recoverygets back on track after a command fails28th of 55
Task outcomefinishes what the session set out to do16th of 55

Placings on Arena's agent boards, from live sessions people ran themselves. A model can lead on one of these and sit mid-field on the others.

Other boards it appears on
Arena Instruction Following 25th of 168LiveBench 38th of 58LiveBench Instruction Following 47th of 58Arena Agent · Tool use 9th of 55Arena Agent · Steerability 12th of 55Arena Agent · Task outcome 16th of 55Arena Agent · Recovery 28th of 55

Boards this model appears on that none of the ratings above are built on.

Every published score for this model20 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 20 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
LiveBenchreasoning
73.16source ↗
51.77source ↗
79.65source ↗
73.74source ↗
76.24source ↗
89.78source ↗
78.63source ↗
0.04source ↗
0.011source ↗
0.045source ↗
0.039source ↗
0.004source ↗
1512source ↗
1455source ↗
1496source ↗
1470source ↗
1487source ↗
1476source ↗
1602source ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

A card many people ownToo large

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at 475 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step upToo large

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at 475 / 32 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step downToo large

Radeon RX 7900 XT · 20 GB

Weights at 475 / 20 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

What is quantisation? →
475 GBest
Too large
557.2 GBest
Too large
832.4 GBest
Too large
This model on every device we track71 devicesThe Q4 build most people download, on each device: what the weights come to, how much context the memory leaves, and whether it runs. Smallest device that runs it first.
Apple M3 Ultra (80-core GPU)512 GB475 GBestnot calculatedSpills to system RAM
Apple M2 Ultra (76-core GPU)192 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
B200 (SXM 192GB)192 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Instinct MI300X192 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
H200 141GB SXM141 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 Ultra (64-core GPU)128 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M3 Max (40-core GPU)128 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M4 Max (40-core GPU)128 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M5 Max (40-core GPU)128 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10)128 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (Radeon 8060S)128 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 Max (38-core GPU)96 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell96 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
A100 80GB SXM80 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
H100 80GB SXM80 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 Max (32-core GPU)64 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M4 Max (32-core GPU)64 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M4 Pro (20-core GPU)64 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M5 Max (32-core GPU)64 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M5 Pro (20-core GPU)64 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
L40S48 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
RTX 6000 Ada48 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M3 Pro (18-core GPU)36 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU)32 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 Pro (19-core GPU)32 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M4 (10-core GPU)32 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M5 (10-core GPU)32 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 509032 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 (10-core GPU)24 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M3 (10-core GPU)24 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 309024 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti24 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 409024 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 7900 XTX24 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 7900 XT20 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 (8-core GPU)16 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB16 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER16 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER16 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB16 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti16 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 508016 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 907016 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 9070 XT16 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Arc B58012 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB12 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER12 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 507012 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Arc B57010 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 3080 10GB10 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 16 GB · 2024 or newer8 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 (8-core GPU, 8GB unified)8 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 (8-core GPU, 8GB unified)8 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB8 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4060 8GB8 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 66008 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 17 Pro6.6 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 12 GB · 2023 or newer6 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER6 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 15 Pro4.4 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 164.4 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 16 Pro4.4 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 174.4 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 8 GB · 2020–20224 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 8 GB · 2023 or newer4 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 143.3 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 153.3 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 6 GB3 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 132.2 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone SE (3rd gen)2.2 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 4 GB2 GB475 GBestnot calculatedToo large

Check against your own machine → · Where to rent it hosted →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Prices checked between 4 hours and 3 days ago — each listing carries its own date.

Some hosts sell this model at two prices: on their own price list (“direct”) and on their OpenRouter listing (“through OpenRouter”). Where the two differ, the row shows both, each with the date we last read it.

Cheapest published offer

Reka, through OpenRouter

Cheapest of 32 live listings.

per 1M tokens
$0.46 in / $0.91 out
Context served
1M
Throughput
~54 tok/s
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
RekaThrough OpenRouter$0.46 / $0.91checked 4 hours ago1M131K max reply54 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
StreamLakefp8Through OpenRouter$0.56 / $1.76checked 4 hours ago1M128K max reply52 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
DeepInfrafp4Direct and through OpenRouter$0.75 / $2.40directchecked 4 hours ago$0.56 / $1.80through OpenRouterchecked 4 hours ago1M164K max reply through OpenRouter53 tok/sthrough OpenRouterDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterNoDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterNoDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterConfirmed
Novita AIfp8Direct and through OpenRouter$1.40 / $4.40directchecked 4 hours ago$0.65 / $2.04through OpenRouterchecked 4 hours ago1M131K max reply through OpenRouter70 tok/sthrough OpenRouterDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterNoDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterNoDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterConfirmed
SiliconFlowfp8Through OpenRouter$0.70 / $2.20checked 4 hours ago1M262K max reply71 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
DigitalOcean GradientThrough OpenRouter$0.70 / $2.20checked 4 hours ago262K236K max reply85 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Decartmxfp4Through OpenRouter$0.39 / $2.40checked 4 hours ago1M944K max reply59 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
CoreWeavefp4Through OpenRouter$0.76 / $2.42checked 4 hours ago1M944K max reply8 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Morphfp8Through OpenRouter$0.46 / $2.84checked 4 hours ago1M944K max reply76 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
AtlasCloudfp8Through OpenRouter$0.94 / $2.95checked 4 hours ago1M131K max reply61 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
Phalafp8Through OpenRouter$1.26 / $3.00checked 4 hours ago1M131K max reply122 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Alibaba Cloudfp8Through OpenRouter$0.97 / $3.04checked 4 hours ago1M131K max reply58 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
OpenRouterOpenRouter's own listing$0.41 / $3.99checked 4 hours ago1Mnot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
WaferThrough OpenRouter$0.41 / $3.99checked 4 hours ago1M944K max reply85 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
RelaceThrough OpenRouter$0.13 / $4.00checked 4 hours ago1M131K max reply80 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Inceptronfp4Through OpenRouter$1.39 / $4.39checked 4 hours ago1M944K max reply59 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Together AIThrough OpenRouter$1.40 / $4.40checked 4 hours ago1M944K max reply67 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Parasailfp4Through OpenRouter$1.40 / $4.40checked 4 hours ago262K236K max reply60 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Mistral AInvfp4Through OpenRouter$1.40 / $4.40checked 4 hours ago1M131K max reply93 tok/sNoYes30 daysUnknown
Cloudflare Workers AIThrough OpenRouter$1.18 / $4.40checked 4 hours ago262K236K max reply23 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
GMICloudfp8Through OpenRouter$1.40 / $4.40checked 4 hours ago1M944K max reply15 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
Baidufp8Through OpenRouter$1.40 / $4.40checked 22 hours ago1M131K max reply57 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
Fireworks AIThrough OpenRouter$1.40 / $4.40checked 3 days ago1M944K max reply75 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
FriendliThrough OpenRouter$1.40 / $4.40checked 4 hours ago1M944K max reply83 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
Z.AIfp8Through OpenRouter$1.40 / $4.40checked 4 hours ago1M131K max reply68 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Basetenfp8Through OpenRouter$1.40 / $4.40checked 4 hours ago1M262K max reply49 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Venice AIfp8Through OpenRouter$1.40 / $4.40checked 4 hours ago1M131K max reply91 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Mistral AIeuThrough OpenRouter$1.54 / $4.84checked 4 hours ago1M128K max reply89 tok/sNoYes30 daysConfirmed
Baidufast tierfp4Through OpenRouter$1.40 / $4.90checked 34 hours ago1M131K max reply81 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
Basetenfast tierfp8Through OpenRouter$2.10 / $6.60checked 4 hours ago1M262K max reply109 tok/sNoNoUnknown
Alibaba Cloudfast tierfp8Through OpenRouter$2.31 / $7.26checked 4 hours ago1M131K max reply48 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
Decartfast tierfp4Through OpenRouter$2.25 / $8.00checked 4 hours ago1M944K max reply162 tok/sNoNoUnknown

Across the 32 listings we hold: 31 say they do not train on prompts (2 of them only through OpenRouter), 0 say they do and 1 does not say. 19 appear in the zero-retention registry we check (2 of them only through OpenRouter); the rest are unknown to us.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
RekaThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
StreamLakefp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
DeepInfrafp4Direct and through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Novita AIfp8Direct and through OpenRouter✓✓✗
SiliconFlowfp8Through OpenRouter✓✗✗
DigitalOcean GradientThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
Decartmxfp4Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
CoreWeavefp4Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Morphfp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
AtlasCloudfp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✗
Phalafp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Alibaba Cloudfp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
OpenRouterOpenRouter's own listing✓✓✓
WaferThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
RelaceThrough OpenRouter✓✓✗
Inceptronfp4Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Together AIThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
Parasailfp4Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Mistral AInvfp4Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Cloudflare Workers AIThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
GMICloudfp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Baidufp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Fireworks AIThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
FriendliThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
Z.AIfp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✗
Basetenfp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Venice AIfp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Mistral AIeuThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
Baidufast · fp4Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Basetenfast · fp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Alibaba Cloudfast · fp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Decartfast · fp4Through OpenRouter✓✓✓

Tool calling: 32 of 32 listings say yes. JSON output: 31 of 32 listings say yes, 1 says no. Strict schema: 27 of 32 listings say yes, 5 say no.

03

Models people weigh against GLM 5.2

04

When we formed this view

Recent changes

Oct 1, 2026Price changeGLM 5.2 repriced across 5 hosts: Wafer input down 71%, Inceptron input up 85%
What movedGLM 5.2 moved on 5 hosts: Inceptron: input +85% ($0.75 → $1.39 per 1M tokens), output +83% ($2.40 → $4.39 per 1M tokens), cache read +48% ($0.169 → $0.250 per 1M tokens); Wafer: input −71% ($1.40 → $0.41 per 1M tokens), output −9% ($4.40 → $3.99 per 1M tokens); Reka: input −50% ($1.40 → $0.70 per 1M tokens), output −68% ($4.40 → $1.40 per 1M tokens), cache read −30% ($0.20 → $0.14 per 1M tokens); Morph: input +20% ($0.387 → $0.464 per 1M tokens), output +6% ($2.69 → $2.84 per 1M tokens); Relace: input −3% ($0.135 → $0.131 per 1M tokens), cache read −3% ($0.135 → $0.131 per 1M tokens)
Sep 30, 2026Price changeGLM 5.2 cut across 3 hosts, by up to 72% at Decart (mxfp4) (input)
What movedGLM 5.2 moved on 3 hosts: Decart (mxfp4): input −72% ($1.40 → $0.39 per 1M tokens), output −45% ($4.40 → $2.40 per 1M tokens), cache read −42% ($0.26 → $0.15 per 1M tokens); Relace: input −33% ($0.200 → $0.135 per 1M tokens), cache read −33% ($0.200 → $0.135 per 1M tokens); Reka: cache read −23% ($0.26 → $0.20 per 1M tokens)
Sep 29, 2026Price changeGLM 5.2 repriced across 2 hosts: Relace input down 43%, Inceptron input up 110%
What movedGLM 5.2 moved on 2 hosts: Inceptron: input +110% ($0.3565 → $0.7500 per 1M tokens), output −0.0% ($2.401 → $2.400 per 1M tokens), cache read +1% ($0.167 → $0.169 per 1M tokens); Relace: input −43% ($0.35 → $0.20 per 1M tokens), output +14% ($3.50 → $4.00 per 1M tokens)
Sep 28, 2026Price changeGLM 5.2 repriced across 4 hosts: Inceptron input down 27%, Wafer input up 30%
What movedGLM 5.2 moved on 4 hosts: Wafer: input +30% ($1.40 → $1.82 per 1M tokens); Inceptron: input −27% ($0.49 → $0.36 per 1M tokens), output +25% ($1.925 → $2.401 per 1M tokens), cache read +22% ($0.137 → $0.167 per 1M tokens); Cloudflare: input −16% ($1.40 → $1.18 per 1M tokens); Relace: input −13% ($0.40 → $0.35 per 1M tokens)
Sep 26, 2026Price changeHost Inceptron cut GLM 5.2 output pricing by 40%
What movedinput −24% ($0.646 → $0.489 per 1M tokens), output −40% ($3.18 → $1.92 per 1M tokens), cache read −35% ($0.208 → $0.136 per 1M tokens)
Sep 25, 2026Price changeHost Inceptron repriced GLM 5.2: input down 28%, cache read up 11%
What movedinput −28% ($0.90 → $0.65 per 1M tokens), cache read +11% ($0.19 → $0.21 per 1M tokens)
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored 0.04 via Max on Arena Agent
What movedleaderboard
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored 0.011 via Max on Arena Agent · Recovery
What movedleaderboard
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored 0.045 via Max on Arena Agent · Steerability
What movedleaderboard
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored 0.039 via Max on Arena Agent · Task outcome
What movedleaderboard

Each date is the day we first saw the change, or the day the maker announced it.

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • We do not hold the active parameter count for it, so how much of it runs on any one token is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 1 of 32 listings does not say whether it trains on prompts, and 2 answer only through OpenRouter, not for their own listing.
  • We hold no batch or off-peak rate for any of its listings.
  • We hold a decode speed for it, but no prompt-processing (prefill) figure, so how long the input side of a job takes is unknown to us.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsMIT License, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

MIT License

Open, few conditionsCommercial use allowed

Fully permissive: do anything with attribution. No patent grant, unlike Apache-2.0.

Identifiers

Hugging Face
zai-org/GLM-5.2
Architecture
Mixture of experts
Takes in, gives back
Text in, text out
Catalogue slug
z-ai-glm-5-2

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us