Models / Tencent/ Hy3

Hy3

Tencent · released Jul 2, 2026 · tencent/Hy3

Input: text. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsApache License 2.0
Params
299B
Context
262K

active per word not recorded by us · about 197K words of context

Our take

Written Sep 17, 2026

Hy3 is a large downloadable text model from Tencent, released under a licence that allows commercial use, changes and redistribution. Its published scores come from human-preference arenas and agent sessions rather than task-accuracy tests, so they say which answers people preferred, not whether the work was done right.

Who should pick it

Use it for everyday text work where you want a large model you can download and build on, or for long-document work where the request capacity means material need not be split up first. Treat the published scores as preference and relative ranking rather than correctness, and trial it on work you can check yourself. Skip it if your task needs a measured accuracy figure, or if you meant to run a model of this size on a single workstation.

The case for it

  • The licence allows commercial use, changes and redistribution (Apache License 2.0), and the weights are downloadable, so a product can be built on it without a licence negotiation.
  • 262144 tokens of request capacity means long documents need not be split up first, though reliable recall across all of it is unverified in our data.
  • Its coding and web-app building arena scores sit above its other supplied arena figures, but those record which answer people preferred, not whether the code was correct.

The case against it

  • No accuracy benchmark is supplied: every score is a preference or relative ranking, so a trial on work you can check yourself is the only way to judge it.
  • Agent-session results are its weakest measured area, with task outcome and overall among its lowest supplied agent scores on a scale where higher is better.
  • 298.8 billion parameters with no per-token active figure supplied, so the whole model is in play on every token and the hardware requirement is not reduced by any sparsity.
00

How good is it?

An open text model for everyday questions, though calling tools to carry out requests is where it struggles.

Good at
  • getting answers to everyday questionsArena Text (overall) · 41st of 168
Less good at
  • calling tools to carry out requestsArena Agent · Tool use · 53rd of 55

EverydayGeneral questions and everyday reasoning

3.5 of 5

Arena Text (overall)41st of 168 · 1457

Arena Hard Prompts 45th of 168Arena Maths 24th of 163

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

3.5 of 5

Arena Coding50th of 168 · 1501

Arena Code (WebDev) 38th of 95

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

2 of 5

Arena Agent41st of 55 · −0.056

Arena Agent is the only board that has scored it for this.

WritingDrafting and rewriting prose

3 of 5

Arena Creative Writing51st of 168 · 1419

Arena Creative Writing is the only board that has scored it for this.

How it behaves in an agent loop
Tool usereaches for the right one, and does not invent one53rd of 55
Steerabilitydoes what it was asked, and changes course when told31st of 55
Recoverygets back on track after a command fails40th of 55
Task outcomefinishes what the session set out to do46th of 55

Placings on Arena's agent boards, from live sessions people ran themselves. A model can lead on one of these and sit mid-field on the others.

Other boards it appears on
Arena Instruction Following 47th of 168Arena Agent · Steerability 31st of 55Arena Agent · Recovery 40th of 55Arena Agent · Task outcome 46th of 55Arena Agent · Tool use 53rd of 55

Boards this model appears on that none of the ratings above are built on.

Every published score for this model12 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 12 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
−0.056source ↗
−0.057source ↗
−0.016source ↗
−0.109source ↗
−0.029source ↗
1501source ↗
1419source ↗
1476source ↗
1482source ↗
1457source ↗
1509source ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

A card many people ownToo large

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at 188.4 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step upToo large

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at 188.4 / 32 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

Comfortable fit

On a MacFits in memory

Apple M3 Ultra (80-core GPU) · 512 GB

Weights at 188.4 / 512 GBest
Spare memory188.1 GB spare
Usable context262K of 262K
Decode speed3 tok/sest

Room to spare. 188.1 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

What is quantisation? →
188.4 GBest
Too large
221 GBest
Too large
330.2 GBest
Too large
This model on every device we track71 devicesThe Q4 build most people download, on each device: what the weights come to, how much context the memory leaves, and whether it runs. Smallest device that runs it first.
Apple M3 Ultra (80-core GPU)512 GB188.4 GBest262KFits in memory
H200 141GB SXM141 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedSpills to system RAMest
Apple M2 Ultra (76-core GPU)192 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedSpills to system RAM
B200 (SXM 192GB)192 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedSpills to system RAMest
Instinct MI300X192 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedSpills to system RAMest
Apple M1 Ultra (64-core GPU)128 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M3 Max (40-core GPU)128 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M4 Max (40-core GPU)128 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M5 Max (40-core GPU)128 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10)128 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo largeest
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (Radeon 8060S)128 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo largeest
Apple M2 Max (38-core GPU)96 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell96 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
A100 80GB SXM80 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
H100 80GB SXM80 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 Max (32-core GPU)64 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M4 Max (32-core GPU)64 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M4 Pro (20-core GPU)64 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M5 Max (32-core GPU)64 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M5 Pro (20-core GPU)64 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
L40S48 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
RTX 6000 Ada48 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M3 Pro (18-core GPU)36 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU)32 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 Pro (19-core GPU)32 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M4 (10-core GPU)32 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M5 (10-core GPU)32 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 509032 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 (10-core GPU)24 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M3 (10-core GPU)24 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 309024 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti24 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 409024 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 7900 XTX24 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 7900 XT20 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 (8-core GPU)16 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB16 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER16 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER16 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB16 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti16 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 508016 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 907016 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 9070 XT16 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Arc B58012 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB12 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER12 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 507012 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Arc B57010 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 3080 10GB10 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 16 GB · 2024 or newer8 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 (8-core GPU, 8GB unified)8 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 (8-core GPU, 8GB unified)8 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB8 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4060 8GB8 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 66008 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 17 Pro6.6 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 12 GB · 2023 or newer6 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER6 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 15 Pro4.4 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 164.4 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 16 Pro4.4 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 174.4 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 8 GB · 2020–20224 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 8 GB · 2023 or newer4 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 143.3 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 153.3 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 6 GB3 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 132.2 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone SE (3rd gen)2.2 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 4 GB2 GB188.4 GBestnot calculatedToo large

Check against your own machine → · Where to rent it hosted →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Prices checked between 4 hours and 10 hours ago — each listing carries its own date.

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 7 live listings.

per 1M tokens
$0.13 in / $0.53 out
Context served
262K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouterOpenRouter's own listing$0.13 / $0.53checked 10 hours ago262Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Tencentfp8Through OpenRouter$0.13 / $0.53checked 10 hours ago262K128K max reply57 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
DeepInfrafp4Direct and through OpenRouter$0.13 / $0.53checked 4 hours ago262K131K max reply through OpenRouter99 tok/sthrough OpenRouterDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterNoDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterNoDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterConfirmed
Novita AIDirect and through OpenRouter$0.14 / $0.58checked 4 hours ago262K236K max reply through OpenRouter60 tok/sthrough OpenRouterDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterNoDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterNoDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterConfirmed
GMICloudbf16Through OpenRouter$0.14 / $0.58checked 4 hours ago262K236K max reply24 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
PhalaThrough OpenRouter$0.15 / $0.64checked 4 hours ago262K236K max reply34 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
AtlasCloudfp8Through OpenRouter$0.20 / $0.80checked 4 hours ago262K131K max reply27 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown

Across the 7 listings we hold: 6 say they do not train on prompts (2 of them only through OpenRouter), 0 say they do and 1 does not say. 4 appear in the zero-retention registry we check (2 of them only through OpenRouter); the rest are unknown to us.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouterOpenRouter's own listing✓✓✓
Tencentfp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✗
DeepInfrafp4Direct and through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Novita AIDirect and through OpenRouter✓✗✓
GMICloudbf16Through OpenRouter✓✓✗
PhalaThrough OpenRouter✓✗✓
AtlasCloudfp8Through OpenRouter✓✗✓

Tool calling: 7 of 7 listings say yes. JSON output: 4 of 7 listings say yes, 3 say no. Strict schema: 5 of 7 listings say yes, 2 say no.

03

Models people weigh against Hy3

04

When we formed this view

Recent changes

Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored −0.056 on Arena Agent
What movedleaderboard
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored −0.057 on Arena Agent · Recovery
What movedleaderboard
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored −0.016 on Arena Agent · Steerability
What movedleaderboard
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored −0.109 on Arena Agent · Task outcome
What movedleaderboard
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored −0.029 on Arena Agent · Tool use
What movedleaderboard
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored 1501 on Arena Coding
What movedleaderboard
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored 1419 on Arena Creative Writing
What movedleaderboard
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored 1476 on Arena Hard Prompts
What movedleaderboard
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored 1446 on Arena Instruction Following
What movedleaderboard
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored 1482 on Arena Maths
What movedleaderboard

Each date is the day we first saw the change, or the day the maker announced it.

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • We do not hold the active parameter count for it, so how much of it runs on any one token is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 1 of 7 listings does not say whether it trains on prompts, and 2 answer only through OpenRouter, not for their own listing.
  • We hold no batch or off-peak rate for any of its listings.
  • We hold a decode speed for it, but no prompt-processing (prefill) figure, so how long the input side of a job takes is unknown to us.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsApache License 2.0, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Apache License 2.0

Open, few conditionsCommercial use allowed

Fully permissive: commercial use, redistribution, and derivatives allowed. Requires attribution and a copy of the license. Includes an express patent grant.

Identifiers

Hugging Face
tencent/Hy3
Architecture
Mixture of experts
Takes in, gives back
Text in, text out
Catalogue slug
tencent-hy3

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us