Models / Tencent/ Hy3

Hy3

Tencent · released Jul 2, 2026 · tencent/Hy3

Input: text. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsApache License 2.0
Params
299B
Context
262K

about 197K words of context

Our take

Written Aug 2, 2026

Hy3 is a large downloadable text model from Tencent with a permissive Apache licence and a 262,144-token request limit. It scores notably higher on coding and web-development tasks than on general chat, though creative writing and agentic work are weaker spots.

Who should pick it

Choose this for long-context coding, reasoning or instruction-following tasks where you need a permissive licence. It suits budget-conscious coding workloads, and any deployment requiring commercial modification or redistribution rights. Skip it if you need creative writing quality, agentic task performance, or multimodal input.

The case for it

  • Coding score is 45.4 points above its general chat score on the Arena leaderboard.
  • Web-development coding peaks another 14.7 points above its general coding score.
  • Apache 2.0 licence permits commercial use, modification and redistribution.
  • 262,144-token request limit handles long documents.

The case against it

  • Creative writing score sits 30 points below its own general chat score.
  • Agentic task performance is negative on measured runs, the only negative scores in its benchmark set.
  • No active parameter count disclosed, so efficiency claims are unverified.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

3.5 of 5

Arena Text (overall)31st of 143 · 1456.3

Arena Hard Prompts 33rd of 143

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

3.5 of 5

Arena Coding35th of 143 · 1500.8

Arena Code (WebDev) 18th of 74

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

2.5 of 5

Arena Agent (IPS)22nd of 36 · −0.01

Arena Agent (IPS) is the only board that has scored it for this.

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where Hy3 placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 34th of 143 · 1424.1
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 32nd of 143

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model7 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 7 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
−0.01independentsource ↗
1500.8independentsource ↗
1474.6independentsource ↗
1456.3independentsource ↗
1516.5independentsource ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%
A card many people ownToo large

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M188.4 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step upToo large

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M188.4 / 32 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

Comfortable fit

On a MacFits in memory

Apple M3 Ultra (80-core GPU) · 512 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M188.4 / 512 GBest
Spare memory188.1 GB spare
Usable context262K of 262K
Decode speed3 tok/sest

Room to spare. 188.1 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
188.4 GBest
Too large
Q5_K_M
221 GBest
Too large
Q8_0
330.2 GBest
Too large

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 8 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.13 in / $0.53 out
Context served
262K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouter$0.13 / $0.53262Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Tencentfp8$0.13 / $0.53262K49 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
GMICloudbf16$0.13 / $0.53262K79 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
DeepInfrafp8$0.14 / $0.58262K48 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Novita AI$0.14 / $0.58262Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Novita AI$0.14 / $0.58262K50 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
DeepInfrafp8$0.14 / $0.58262Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
AtlasCloudfp8$0.20 / $0.80262K120 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown

Across the 8 listings we hold: 5 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 3 do not say. 3 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouter
Tencentfp8
GMICloudbf16
DeepInfrafp8
Novita AI
Novita AI
DeepInfrafp8
AtlasCloudfp8

Tool calling: 5 of 8 listings say yes, 1 says no, 2 publish no parameter list. JSON output: 3 of 8 listings say yes, 3 say no, 2 publish no parameter list. Strict schema: 4 of 8 listings say yes, 2 say no, 2 publish no parameter list.

03

Models people weigh against Hy3

04

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1500.8 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1424.1 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1474.6 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1447 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1456.3 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1516.5 on Arena Code (WebDev)leaderboard
Jul 28, 2026BenchmarkScored −0.01 on Arena Agent (IPS)leaderboard
Jul 27, 2026Benchmark updatehy3 enters LMArena at 1457 Elo3275 votes
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline
Jul 2, 2026AnnouncedHy3 announced by Tencent

Prices last checked 34h ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • 2 of 8 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 3 of 8 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsApache License 2.0, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Apache License 2.0

permissiveCommercial use allowed

Fully permissive: commercial use, redistribution, and derivatives allowed. Requires attribution and a copy of the license. Includes an express patent grant.

Identifiers

Hugging Face
tencent/Hy3
Architecture
Mixture of experts
Modality record
text->text
Catalogue slug
tencent-hy3

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us