Models / Reson8/ Resonant 1

Resonant 1

Reson8

Speech to textTranscribes a recording into words

Input: audio. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Closed
Input
None held
Output
None held
Cached
None held

We don't hold a list price for this model yet · hosted only — no weights published

Our take

Written Sep 29, 2026

Resonant 1 is a speech-to-text model with strong measured accuracy on clean and accented English, but we list no download and no host for it, so there is no route to run it that our data supports. Its weak spot is corporate earnings calls, where it sits near the bottom of the field.

Who should pick it

Reach for it on clearly recorded English speech — read-aloud audio, podcasts, video — or on accented English, where it is better than most models on that condition. Before you plan around it, note that we list neither a download nor a host, so there is no way to run it that our data supports. Skip it if you need accurate transcription of corporate earnings calls, or if you need a route to run it at all.

The case for it

  • On clean read-aloud recordings it gets 0.9% of words wrong, better than most models on that condition, so read-aloud material is where it earns its place.
  • On accented speech it gets 5.5% of words wrong, better than most models on that condition, which makes it a reasonable first trial for non-native English.
  • On podcast and video recordings it gets 7.4% of words wrong, better than most models on that condition, so everyday internet audio is within its range.
  • 5th of 76 on Open ASR WER as of 28 Sep 2026, which puts it in the top group on the board's overall English measure.

The case against it

  • On corporate earnings calls it gets 2.77% of words wrong, 57th of 92 on Financial calls as of 28 Sep 2026 — a weak placing on that kind of recording.
  • We list no download for it and no host for it, so there is no route to run it that our data supports.
  • Every accuracy figure we hold is English; nine languages are listed but none of the others is measured, so accuracy in them is unverified.
00

How good is it?

A speech-to-text model for turning recordings of meetings, podcasts and accented speakers into written text.

Good at
  • turning spoken English into written textOpen ASR WER · 5th of 76
  • transcribing speakers with a range of accentsAccented speech · 5th of 76
  • transcribing podcasts and video audioPodcasts and video · 12th of 92
  • transcribing clear recordings of people reading aloudClean read speech · 2nd of 92

TranscriptionTurning speech into text4.5 of 5Open ASR WER · 5th of 76

Words it gets right

96%

Misses roughly one word in 25, averaged over nine English test sets.

Languages

9

Stated by the leaderboard; we do not hold the list itself.

Where it struggles
Read aloudaudiobooks, clean recording0.9%2nd of 92
Podcasts and videoeveryday internet audio7.4%12th of 92
Accented speechspeakers from many countries5.5%5th of 76
Meetingsa room, several people, far microphone8.2%24th of 92

Percentage of words wrong on each set, lower better. Bars are scaled to this model's own worst case; the placing beneath each rate is against every model measured on that set.

The figures above come from the Open ASR Leaderboard, an independent public test that runs every model on the same recordings. It is the only measurement of transcription quality we know of, so there are no other scores to show.

Other boards it appears on
Clean read speech 2nd of 92Harder read speech 5th of 92European-accented speech 10th of 92Podcasts and video 12th of 92Recorded meetings 24th of 92Financial calls 57th of 92Accented speech 5th of 76

Each of these is the same transcription job on a different kind of recording, so together they say where it holds up and where it slips — not how closely it follows an instruction.

Every published score for this model8 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 8 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
4.01source ↗
5.48source ↗
2.77source ↗
8.22source ↗
2.19source ↗
7.38source ↗
0.92source ↗
2.09source ↗
01

Where to get it

We hold no priced listing for Resonant 1.

There is no copy to download and no host in our price data, so Reson8 is where to look. We watch OpenRouter, the provider APIs we track and the LiteLLM price set; this version appears in none of them, which is a gap in what we collect rather than a statement about what Reson8 sells.

02

When we formed this view

Recent changes

Sep 11, 2026BenchmarkScored 4.01 on Open ASR WER
What movedleaderboard
Sep 11, 2026BenchmarkScored 5.48 on Accented speech
What movedleaderboard
Sep 11, 2026BenchmarkScored 7.38 on Podcasts and video
What movedleaderboard
Sep 11, 2026BenchmarkScored 2.09 on Harder read speech
What movedleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 2.77 on Financial calls
What movedleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 8.22 on Recorded meetings
What movedleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 2.19 on European-accented speech
What movedleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 0.92 on Clean read speech
What movedleaderboard
Aug 1, 2026ListedListed on LLMap
What movedfirst indexed by our pipeline

Each date is the day we first saw the change, or the day the maker announced it.

What we do not know about this model yet

  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • We don't hold a list price for this model yet — the gap is ours, not the lab's.
03

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsWe hold no licence record for this model. Inside are the identifiers you need to pull it — its Hugging Face repo where we have one, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

We hold no licence row of this model's own. A source states its weights are not published, so the determination that governs it is the one for closed weights, API access only.

Identifiers

Takes in, gives back
Audio in, text out
Catalogue slug
reson8-resonant-1

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us