Models / OpenAI/ gpt-oss-120b

gpt-oss-120b

OpenAI · released Aug 4, 2025 · openai/gpt-oss-120b

Input: text. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsApache License 2.0
Params
120B
Context
131K

about 98K words of context

Our take

Written Aug 3, 2026

gpt-oss-120b is OpenAI's first downloadable model, released in 2025 with a permissive Apache licence and a 120.4-billion-parameter dense architecture. It offers broad measured coverage across chat, coding and creative tasks, though its scores vary sharply by category and it is text-only.

Who should pick it

Pick this as a research or fine-tuning foundation where a permissive licence matters — Apache 2.0 allows commercial use, redistribution and modification. Use it for coding workloads where its measured score is strongest, or where host choice lets you trade cost against speed. Skip it if you need multimodal handling, if creative writing quality is critical, or if you want sparse-parameter efficiency.

The case for it

  • Broad benchmark coverage with consistent scores across two evaluation dates — most categories drifted less than 0.2 points between measurements.
  • Truly permissive open licence from a major frontier lab: commercial use, fine-tuning, redistribution and modification all permitted.
  • Ten distinct hosting options, with a wide spread of throughput and pricing.
  • Coding performance is 37.8 points above its overall text score on the Arena leaderboard.

The case against it

  • No parameter efficiency: 120.4 billion active parameters with no disclosed sparse or mixture-of-experts architecture, so inference cost scales with the full model size.
  • Creative writing is a clear relative weakness, scoring 74.8 points below its coding score.
  • Throughput varies 7.4-fold by provider for the same model, suggesting strong infrastructure sensitivity.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

2 of 5

Arena Text (overall)100th of 143 · 1352.3

Arena Hard Prompts 103rd of 143Arena Maths 87th of 139

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

2 of 5

Arena Coding103rd of 143 · 1390.1

Arena Coding is the only board that has scored it for this.

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

Scored, not ratedSWE-bench Verified · 33rd of 39 · 26via mini-SWE-agent

gpt-oss-120b is not on Arena Agent (IPS), which is where the rating would come from, so there is no rating here. It is on SWE-bench Verified, in 33rd of 39 with 26.

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where gpt-oss-120b placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 117th of 143 · 1277.5
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 106th of 143

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model7 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 7 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
1390.1independentsource ↗
1362independentsource ↗
1381.3independentsource ↗
1352.3independentsource ↗
26via mini-SWE-agentindependentsource ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%
A card many people ownToo large

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M75.9 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step upToo large

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M75.9 / 32 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

Comfortable fit

On a MacFits in memory

Apple M1 Ultra (64-core GPU) · 128 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M75.9 / 128 GBest
Spare memory16.5 GB spare
Usable context131K of 131K
Decode speed7 tok/sest

Room to spare. 16.5 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
75.9 GBest
Too large
Q5_K_M
89.1 GBest
Too large
Q8_0
133 GBest
Too large

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 23 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.037 in / $0.17 out
Context served
131K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
DeepInfrabfloat16$0.037 / $0.17131Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
OpenRouter$0.037 / $0.17131Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
CoreWeavefp4$0.030 / $0.17131K20 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
DeepInfrabf16$0.037 / $0.17131K48 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Novita AI$0.050 / $0.25131Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Novita AIfp4$0.050 / $0.25131K75 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Google Vertex AIglobal$0.090 / $0.36131K148 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
SiliconFlowfp8$0.050 / $0.45131K21 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
DigitalOcean Gradient$0.070 / $0.49128K39 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Mancer 2fp8$0.10 / $0.50131K31 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Basetenfp4$0.10 / $0.50128K122 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
SambaNova$0.22 / $0.59131Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Phala$0.15 / $0.60131K88 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
DeepInfraturbo tierbf16$0.15 / $0.60131K139 tok/sNoNoUnknown
Together AI$0.15 / $0.60131K145 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Amazon Bedrock$0.15 / $0.60131K343 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Amazon Bedrockeu-west-1$0.15 / $0.60131K122 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Groq$0.15 / $0.60131K291 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Nebius AI Studiofp4$0.15 / $0.60131K285 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Cerebrasfp16$0.35 / $0.75131K480 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Parasailfp4$0.10 / $0.75131K136 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Mara$0.15 / $0.75131K144 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
SambaNova$0.14 / $0.95131K358 tok/sNoNoConfirmed

Across the 23 listings we hold: 19 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 4 do not say. 18 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
DeepInfrabfloat16
OpenRouter
CoreWeavefp4
DeepInfrabf16
Novita AI
Novita AIfp4
Google Vertex AIglobal
SiliconFlowfp8
DigitalOcean Gradient
Mancer 2fp8
Basetenfp4
SambaNova
Phala
DeepInfraturbo · bf16
Together AI
Amazon Bedrock
Amazon Bedrockeu-west-1
Groq
Nebius AI Studiofp4
Cerebrasfp16
Parasailfp4
Mara
SambaNova

Tool calling: 15 of 23 listings say yes, 5 say no, 3 publish no parameter list. JSON output: 16 of 23 listings say yes, 4 say no, 3 publish no parameter list. Strict schema: 16 of 23 listings say yes, 4 say no, 3 publish no parameter list.

03

Models people weigh against gpt-oss-120b

04

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 3, 2026Price changeMancer 2 raised gpt-oss-120b pricing by 67%input +67% ($0.060 → $0.10 per 1M tokens)
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1390.1 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1277.5 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1362 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1325.3 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1381.3 on Arena Mathsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1352.3 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Jul 30, 2026Price changeMancer 2 raised gpt-oss-120b pricing by 9%input +9% ($0.055 → $0.060 per 1M tokens)
Jul 29, 2026Price changeDeepInfra cut gpt-oss-120b pricing by 75%input −75% ($0.15 → $0.037 per 1M tokens); output −72% ($0.60 → $0.17 per 1M tokens)
Jul 28, 2026Price changemancer repriced openai/gpt-oss-120binput $0.05 → $0.055, output $0.5 → $0.5 per 1M tokens

Prices last checked 34h ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • 3 of 23 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 4 of 23 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsApache License 2.0, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Apache License 2.0

permissiveCommercial use allowed

Fully permissive: commercial use, redistribution, and derivatives allowed. Requires attribution and a copy of the license. Includes an express patent grant.

Identifiers

Architecture
Mixture of experts
Modality record
text->text
Catalogue slug
openai-gpt-oss-120b

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us