Models / NVIDIA/ Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3 Super

NVIDIA · released Mar 10, 2026 · nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-FP8

Input: text. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsCustom licence
Params
124B
Context
1M

about 750K words of context · download allowed, licence restricts use

Our take

Written Aug 3, 2026

Nemotron 3 Super is a large text-only model from NVIDIA with a one-million-token request limit and a restricted licence. It excels at coding among its measured skills, though creative writing lags well behind, and provider choice varies sharply in both speed and cost.

Who should pick it

Pick this for long-context text work at one million tokens, or for coding workloads where it scores highest among its own measured arenas. Use it if you need high throughput and can route to the fastest host, or if you want budget entry pricing from the cheaper providers. Skip it if you need a permissive licence, creative writing quality, or guaranteed fast throughput regardless of which host you land on.

The case for it

  • One-million-token request limit — the largest context window in its class among measured models.
  • Coding is its standout capability, with a 106-point gap above its own creative writing score.
  • Peak throughput of 124 tokens per second available from one host, with another at 87.
  • Wide provider choice at competitive entry pricing from some hosts.

The case against it

  • Creative writing is its clear weak point, the lowest of six measured arenas and 106 points below its coding score.
  • Custom restricted licence, not Apache or MIT — check terms before commercial use or redistribution.
  • Throughput varies dramatically by provider, from 6 to 124 tokens per second, with slower hosts also charging more.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

2 of 5

Arena Text (overall)97th of 143 · 1360.8

Arena Hard Prompts 96th of 143Arena Maths 90th of 139

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

2 of 5

Arena Coding98th of 143 · 1409.7

Arena Coding is the only board that has scored it for this.

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored Nemotron 3 Super for this. We would take the rating from Arena Agent (IPS).

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where Nemotron 3 Super placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 106th of 143 · 1303.7
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 96th of 143

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model6 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 6 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
1409.7independentsource ↗
1380.2independentsource ↗
1375.6independentsource ↗
1360.8independentsource ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%
A card many people ownToo large

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M77.9 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step upToo large

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M77.9 / 32 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

Comfortable fit

On a MacFits in memory

Apple M1 Ultra (64-core GPU) · 128 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M77.9 / 128 GBest
Spare memory14.4 GB spare
Usable context131K of 1M
Decode speed6 tok/sest

Room to spare. 14.4 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
77.9 GBest
Too large
Q5_K_M
91.4 GBest
Too large
Q8_0
136.6 GBest
Too large

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 5 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.085 in / $0.40 out
Context served
1M
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouter$0.085 / $0.401Mnot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
DeepInfrabfloat16$0.085 / $0.40262Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
DeepInfrabf16$0.085 / $0.40262K87 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
DigitalOcean Gradient$0.21 / $0.461M9 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Nebius AI Studiofp4$0.30 / $0.90262K126 tok/sNoNoConfirmed

Across the 5 listings we hold: 3 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 2 do not say. 3 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouter
DeepInfrabfloat16
DeepInfrabf16
DigitalOcean Gradient
Nebius AI Studiofp4

Tool calling: 3 of 5 listings say yes, 1 says no, 1 publishes no parameter list. JSON output: 4 of 5 listings say yes, 1 publishes no parameter list. Strict schema: 2 of 5 listings say yes, 2 say no, 1 publishes no parameter list.

03

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1409.7 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1303.7 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1380.2 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1345.6 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1375.6 on Arena Mathsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1360.8 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline
Mar 10, 2026AnnouncedNemotron 3 Super announced by NVIDIA

Prices last checked 3d ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • 1 of 5 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 2 of 5 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
04

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsCustom licence, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Custom licence

restricted_openCustom licence — review the terms

This model ships custom license terms that don't map to a known template. We haven't parsed them, so commercial use, redistribution and derivatives are unverified — review the original terms before shipping.

Identifiers

Architecture
Mixture of experts
Modality record
text->text
Catalogue slug
nvidia-nemotron-3-super

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us