Models / Nous Research/ Hermes 3 70B Instruct

Hermes 3 70B Instruct

Nous Research · released Jul 29, 2024 · NousResearch/Hermes-3-Llama-3.1-70B

Input: text. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsLlama 3 Community License
Params
70.6B
Context
131K

about 98K words of context · download allowed, licence restricts use

Our take

Written Aug 3, 2026

Hermes 3 is a 70.6-billion-parameter text-only model from Nous Research with a 131,072-token request limit and a restricted community licence. It follows instructions well but trails similarly sized models on raw knowledge and reasoning tests.

Who should pick it

Pick this for long-context text tasks where downloadable weights matter, or for instruction-following workflows where format compliance is more important than encyclopaedic knowledge. It is a viable budget option when uniform pricing across hosts simplifies cost planning. Skip it if you need unrestricted commercial use, image or audio input, or strong reasoning and knowledge performance from a 70-billion-parameter model.

The case for it

  • Strong instruction-following relative to its knowledge benchmarks: IFEval 76.6% sits well above its MMLU-Pro 41.4%, showing format compliance outpaces raw knowledge.
  • Very long request limit for a downloadable model of this size, with the full 70.6 billion parameters attending across all 131,072 tokens.
  • Uniform pricing across the two cheapest tracked hosts, with no provider markup variation.

The case against it

  • Weak raw knowledge and reasoning for its parameter class, with MMLU-Pro 41.4% and GPQA Diamond 14.9% both below typical 70-billion-parameter results.
  • Only one of three tracked offers discloses throughput, leaving most hosting performance unverified.
  • Restricted licence requires a separate commercial agreement, unlike permissive Apache or MIT alternatives.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

Scored, not ratedGPQA Diamond · 5th of 16 · 14.9

Hermes 3 70B Instruct is not on Arena Text (overall), which is where the rating would come from, so there is no rating here. It is on GPQA Diamond, in 5th of 16 with 14.9.

MMLU-Pro 7th of 16

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored Hermes 3 70B Instruct for this. We would take the rating from Arena Coding.

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored Hermes 3 70B Instruct for this. We would take the rating from Arena Agent (IPS).

WritingWe do not rate this

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored this model for writing. Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage.

Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
IFEval 7th of 16

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model3 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 3 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
GPQA Diamondreasoning
14.9independentsource ↗
IFEvalchat
76.6independentsource ↗
MMLU-Proreasoning
41.4independentsource ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%
A card many people ownToo large

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M44.5 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step upToo large

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M44.5 / 32 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

On a MacFits in memoryest

Apple M1 Max (32-core GPU) · 64 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M44.5 / 64 GBest
Spare memory0.3 GB spare
Usable context2K of 131K
Decode speed7 tok/sest

Borderline fit on an estimated size. It leaves 0.3 GB spare on a size we calculated rather than measured, and a 10% error either way would change the answer.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
44.5 GBest
Too large
Q5_K_M
52.2 GBest
Too large
Q8_0
78 GBest
Too large

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 3 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.70 in / $0.70 out
Context served
131K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouter$0.70 / $0.70131Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
DeepInfrafp8$0.70 / $0.70131Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
DeepInfrafp8$0.70 / $0.70131K33 tok/sNoNoConfirmed

Across the 3 listings we hold: 1 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 2 do not say. 1 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouter
DeepInfrafp8
DeepInfrafp8

Tool calling: 0 of 3 listings say yes, 2 say no, 1 publishes no parameter list. JSON output: 2 of 3 listings say yes, 1 publishes no parameter list. Strict schema: 2 of 3 listings say yes, 1 publishes no parameter list.

03

Models people weigh against Hermes 3 70B Instruct

04

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 3, 2026BenchmarkScored 14.9 on GPQA Diamondleaderboard
Aug 3, 2026BenchmarkScored 76.6 on IFEvalleaderboard
Aug 3, 2026BenchmarkScored 41.4 on MMLU-Proleaderboard
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline
Jul 29, 2024AnnouncedHermes 3 70B Instruct announced by Nous Research

Prices last checked 35h ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • 1 of 3 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 2 of 3 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
  • We hold no cached-input rate for any of its listings.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsLlama 3 Community License, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Llama 3 Community License

restricted_openCommercial use allowed

Commercial use allowed below 700M MAU; requires "Built with Meta Llama 3" attribution and Llama naming on derivatives.

Identifiers

Architecture
Dense
Modality record
text->text
Catalogue slug
nousresearch-hermes-3-70b-instruct

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us