Models / Meta/ Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Meta · released Sep 18, 2024 · meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct

Input: text. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsLlama 3.2 Community License
Params
3.2B
Context
131K

about 98K words of context · download allowed, licence restricts use

Our take

Written Aug 3, 2026

Llama 3.2 is a tiny text-only model from Meta that can handle up to 131,072 tokens in a single request — an unusually long reach for something this small. It is built for edge devices and cost-sensitive workloads where context length matters more than raw knowledge.

Who should pick it

Pick this for simple instruction tasks that need very long context at minimal cost, or for edge deployment where a lightweight download must still read large documents. It is the practical choice when you want to stay inside a tight inference budget. Skip it if you need deep subject knowledge, strong reasoning, or a permissive licence — the community licence carries usage limits for large deployers, and its academic scores are weak.

The case for it

  • Exceptionally long request limit for its size: 131,072 tokens at only 3.2 billion parameters.
  • Among the cheapest hosted inference we track in its class.
  • Instruction-following score of 72% is a clear bright spot against otherwise modest benchmark results.

The case against it

  • Weak on knowledge and reasoning tests: 20.2% on MMLU-Pro and 2.8% on GPQA Diamond.
  • Arena scores are tightly clustered across all six categories we track, with no standout domain from coding to creative writing.
  • Llama 3.2 Community Licence is not fully permissive; large deployers face usage restrictions.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

1 of 5

Arena Text (overall)142nd of 143 · 1166.4

Arena Hard Prompts 142nd of 143Arena Maths 138th of 139GPQA Diamond 13th of 16MMLU-Pro 15th of 16

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

1 of 5

Arena Coding142nd of 143 · 1176

Arena Coding is the only board that has scored it for this.

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for this. We would take the rating from Arena Agent (IPS).

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where Llama 3.2 3B Instruct placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 142nd of 143 · 1144.4
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 142nd of 143IFEval 10th of 16

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model9 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 9 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
GPQA Diamondreasoning
2.8independentsource ↗
IFEvalchat
72independentsource ↗
1176independentsource ↗
1167.5independentsource ↗
1164.9independentsource ↗
1166.4independentsource ↗
MMLU-Proreasoning
20.2independentsource ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%

Comfortable fit

A card many people ownFits in memory

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M2 / 24 GBest
Spare memory19.5 GB spare
Usable context131K of 131K
Decode speed416 tok/sest

Room to spare. 19.5 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

One step upFits in memory

GeForce RTX 5090 · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M2 / 32 GBest
Spare memory27.5 GB spare
Usable context131K of 131K
Decode speed739 tok/sest

Room to spare. 27.5 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

On a MacFits in memory

Apple M2 (8-core GPU, 8GB unified) · 8 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M2 / 8 GBest
Spare memory2.7 GB spare
Usable context66K of 131K
Decode speed36 tok/sest

Room to spare. 2.7 GB spare means a 10% error in the size would not change the answer.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
2 GBest
Fits in memory
Q5_K_M
2.4 GBest
Fits in memory
Q8_0
3.5 GBest
Fits in memory

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 4 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.050 in / $0.33 out
Context served
131K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
Novita AI$0.030 / $0.05033Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
OpenRouter$0.050 / $0.33131Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Parasailbf16$0.050 / $0.33131K61 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Cloudflare Workers AI$0.051 / $0.3480K73 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown

Across the 4 listings we hold: 2 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 2 do not say. 1 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
Novita AI
OpenRouter
Parasailbf16
Cloudflare Workers AI

Tool calling: 0 of 4 listings say yes, 3 say no, 1 publishes no parameter list. JSON output: 0 of 4 listings say yes, 3 say no, 1 publishes no parameter list. Strict schema: 2 of 4 listings say yes, 1 says no, 1 publishes no parameter list.

03

Models people weigh against Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

04

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 3, 2026BenchmarkScored 2.8 on GPQA Diamondleaderboard
Aug 3, 2026BenchmarkScored 72 on IFEvalleaderboard
Aug 3, 2026BenchmarkScored 20.2 on MMLU-Proleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1176 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1144.4 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1167.5 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1145.5 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1164.9 on Arena Mathsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1166.4 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline

Prices last checked 38h ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • 1 of 4 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 2 of 4 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
  • We hold no cached-input rate for any of its listings.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsLlama 3.2 Community License, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

Llama 3.2 Community License

restricted_openCommercial use allowed

Same terms as Llama 3.1 (700M MAU cap, naming rules). The multimodal 3.2 models add a clause restricting use by entities domiciled in the EU.

Identifiers

Modality record
text->text
Catalogue slug
meta-llama-llama-3-2-3b-instruct

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us