Models / DeepSeek/ DeepSeek V4 Pro

DeepSeek V4 Pro

DeepSeek · released Apr 22, 2026 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Input: text. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsMIT License
Params
1.6T
Context
1M

37B active per word · about 786K words of context

Our take

Written Sep 2, 2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro is a large downloadable text model with a one-million-token request limit and strong mathematics scores. Its mixture-of-experts design keeps only 37 billion parameters active per token, making it more efficient to run than its total size suggests.

Who should pick it

Choose this for mathematics-heavy workloads or long-document analysis at one million tokens. It suits budget API inference with wide provider choice, or self-hosting under a permissive licence. Skip it if you need image, video or audio input, agentic coding, or consistently fast throughput across providers.

The case for it

  • Exceptional mathematics performance on refreshed competition problems: LiveBench Mathematics 90.68%.
  • One-million-token request limit — 28.3 times its active parameter count of 37 billion.
  • Strong web-development coding score: 122.3 points above its overall Arena Text score.
  • Wide provider choice with competitive low-end pricing: 30 offers with a 1.6× spread between cheapest and official pricing.

The case against it

  • Weak on agentic tasks: LiveBench Agentic Coding 42.63%, 18.9 points below its next lowest subscore.
  • Throughput varies 3.6× by provider, from 16 to 57 tokens per second.
  • Text-only: no image, video or audio input.
00

How good is it?

An open-weights text model for everyday questions and drafting prose.

Good at
  • getting answers to everyday questionsArena Text (overall) · 36th of 168
  • drafts, rewrites and editingArena Creative Writing · 32nd of 168

EverydayGeneral questions and everyday reasoning

4 of 5

Arena Text (overall)36th of 168 · 1464

Arena Hard Prompts 38th of 168Arena Maths 41st of 163LiveBench Mathematics 28th of 58LiveBench Data Analysis 30th of 58LiveBench Reasoning 36th of 58

Also on this board: 1455 (Jul 30, 2026). Read the pair, not the higher one.

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

4 of 5

Arena Coding43rd of 168 · 1506

Arena Code (WebDev) 22nd of 95LiveBench Coding 52nd of 58

Also on this board: 1490 (Jul 30, 2026). Read the pair, not the higher one.

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

2.5 of 5

Arena Agent31st of 55 · −0.011

LiveBench Agentic Coding 49th of 58

Also on this board: 0.033 (Sep 25, 2026). Read the pair, not the higher one.

WritingDrafting and rewriting prose

3.5 of 5

Arena Creative Writing32nd of 168 · 1446

LiveBench Language 33rd of 58

Also on this board: 1442 (Jul 30, 2026). Read the pair, not the higher one.

How it behaves in an agent loop
Tool usereaches for the right one, and does not invent one40th of 55
Steerabilitydoes what it was asked, and changes course when told33rd of 55
Recoverygets back on track after a command fails25th of 55
Task outcomefinishes what the session set out to do33rd of 55

Placings on Arena's agent boards, from live sessions people ran themselves. A model can lead on one of these and sit mid-field on the others.

Other boards it appears on
Arena Instruction Following 32nd of 168LiveBench 45th of 58LiveBench Instruction Following 46th of 58Arena Agent · Recovery 25th of 55Arena Agent · Steerability 33rd of 55Arena Agent · Task outcome 33rd of 55Arena Agent · Tool use 40th of 55

Boards this model appears on that none of the ratings above are built on.

Every published score for this model20 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 20 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
LiveBenchreasoning
71.57source ↗
42.63source ↗
69.99source ↗
74.54source ↗
78.13source ↗
90.68source ↗
82.69source ↗
−0.011source ↗
0.024source ↗
−0.025source ↗
−0.034source ↗
−0.002source ↗
1506source ↗
1446source ↗
1483source ↗
1457source ↗
1464source ↗
1582source ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

A card many people ownToo large

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at 1008 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step upToo large

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at 1008 / 32 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step downToo large

Radeon RX 7900 XT · 20 GB

Weights at 1008 / 20 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

What is quantisation? →
1008 GBest
Too large
1182.6 GBest
Too large
1766.7 GBest
Too large
This model on every device we track71 devicesThe Q4 build most people download, on each device: what the weights come to, how much context the memory leaves, and whether it runs. Smallest device that runs it first.
Apple M3 Ultra (80-core GPU)512 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 Ultra (76-core GPU)192 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
B200 (SXM 192GB)192 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Instinct MI300X192 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
H200 141GB SXM141 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 Ultra (64-core GPU)128 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M3 Max (40-core GPU)128 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M4 Max (40-core GPU)128 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M5 Max (40-core GPU)128 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10)128 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (Radeon 8060S)128 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 Max (38-core GPU)96 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell96 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
A100 80GB SXM80 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
H100 80GB SXM80 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 Max (32-core GPU)64 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M4 Max (32-core GPU)64 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M4 Pro (20-core GPU)64 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M5 Max (32-core GPU)64 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M5 Pro (20-core GPU)64 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
L40S48 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
RTX 6000 Ada48 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M3 Pro (18-core GPU)36 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU)32 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 Pro (19-core GPU)32 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M4 (10-core GPU)32 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M5 (10-core GPU)32 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 509032 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 (10-core GPU)24 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M3 (10-core GPU)24 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 309024 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti24 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 409024 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 7900 XTX24 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 7900 XT20 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 (8-core GPU)16 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB16 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER16 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER16 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB16 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti16 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 508016 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 907016 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 9070 XT16 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Arc B58012 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB12 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER12 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 507012 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Arc B57010 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 3080 10GB10 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 16 GB · 2024 or newer8 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M1 (8-core GPU, 8GB unified)8 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Apple M2 (8-core GPU, 8GB unified)8 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB8 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce RTX 4060 8GB8 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Radeon RX 66008 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 17 Pro6.6 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 12 GB · 2023 or newer6 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER6 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 15 Pro4.4 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 164.4 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 16 Pro4.4 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 174.4 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 8 GB · 2020–20224 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 8 GB · 2023 or newer4 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 143.3 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 153.3 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 6 GB3 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone 132.2 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
iPhone SE (3rd gen)2.2 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large
Android phone · 4 GB2 GB1008 GBestnot calculatedToo large

Check against your own machine → · Where to rent it hosted →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Prices checked between 4 hours and 46 hours ago — each listing carries its own date.

Some hosts sell this model at two prices: on their own price list (“direct”) and on their OpenRouter listing (“through OpenRouter”). Where the two differ, the row shows both, each with the date we last read it.

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 26 live listings.

per 1M tokens
$0.78 in / $1.57 out
Context served
1M
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
OpenRouterOpenRouter's own listing$0.78 / $1.57checked 22 hours ago1Mnot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
StreamLakefp8Through OpenRouter$0.78 / $1.57checked 22 hours ago1M384K max reply41 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
Alibaba CloudThrough OpenRouter$0.58 / $1.74checked 4 hours ago1M393K max reply63 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
RekaThrough OpenRouter$0.58 / $1.74checked 4 hours ago1M393K max reply28 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
IonstreamThrough OpenRouter$1.24 / $1.85checked 46 hours ago1M944K max reply82 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
GMICloudfp8Through OpenRouter$0.96 / $1.91checked 4 hours ago1M944K max reply23 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
DeepSeekThrough OpenRouter$0.66 / $1.98checked 4 hours ago1M393K max reply9 tok/sYesYesunknown periodUnknown
StreamLakeThrough OpenRouter$0.66 / $1.98checked 4 hours ago1M384K max reply45 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
DigitalOcean GradientThrough OpenRouter$1.04 / $2.09checked 4 hours ago1M384K max reply49 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Cloudflare Workers AIThrough OpenRouter$1.15 / $2.55checked 4 hours ago1M944K max reply39 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
DeepInfrafp8Direct and through OpenRouter$1.30 / $2.60checked 4 hours ago1M16K max reply through OpenRouter33 tok/sthrough OpenRouterDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterNoDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterNoDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterConfirmed
Alibaba Cloudfp8Through OpenRouter$1.42 / $2.83checked 10 hours ago1M393K max reply41 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
PhalaThrough OpenRouter$0.96 / $2.88checked 4 hours ago1M393K max reply49 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Novita AIfp8Direct and through OpenRouter$1.60 / $3.20directchecked 4 hours ago$0.99 / $2.97through OpenRouterchecked 4 hours ago1M393K max reply through OpenRouter49 tok/sthrough OpenRouterDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterNoDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterNoDirectUnknownThrough OpenRouterConfirmed
SiliconFlowfp8Through OpenRouter$1.50 / $3.13checked 4 hours ago1M393K max reply37 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
NextBitfp8Through OpenRouter$1.06 / $3.17checked 4 hours ago1M944K max reply50 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Venice AIThrough OpenRouter$1.65 / $3.30checked 4 hours ago1M33K max reply51 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
AtlasCloudfp4Through OpenRouter$1.68 / $3.38checked 4 hours ago1M393K max reply45 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
Relacefp4Through OpenRouter$0.17 / $3.50checked 4 hours ago1M393K max reply75 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Microsoft Azure AIusThrough OpenRouter$1.91 / $3.83checked 4 hours ago1M384K max reply58 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
AtlasCloudfp8Through OpenRouter$1.32 / $3.96checked 4 hours ago1M393K max reply34 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
Baidufp8Through OpenRouter$1.32 / $3.96checked 40 hours ago1M393K max reply45 tok/sNoYesunknown periodUnknown
Parasailfp8Through OpenRouter$1.32 / $3.96checked 4 hours ago1M944K max reply65 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
CoreWeavefp8Through OpenRouter$1.31 / $3.96checked 4 hours ago1M944K max reply60 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Together AIThrough OpenRouter$1.32 / $3.96checked 16 hours ago1M944K max reply110 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
WaferThrough OpenRouter$0.55 / $4.20checked 4 hours ago1M944K max reply48 tok/sNoNoConfirmed

Across the 26 listings we hold: 24 say they do not train on prompts (2 of them only through OpenRouter), 1 says it does and 1 does not say. 15 appear in the zero-retention registry we check (2 of them only through OpenRouter); the rest are unknown to us.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
OpenRouterOpenRouter's own listing✓✓✓
StreamLakefp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Alibaba CloudThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
RekaThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
IonstreamThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
GMICloudfp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✗
DeepSeekThrough OpenRouter✓✓✗
StreamLakeThrough OpenRouter✓✓✗
DigitalOcean GradientThrough OpenRouter✓✓✗
Cloudflare Workers AIThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
DeepInfrafp8Direct and through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Alibaba Cloudfp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
PhalaThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
Novita AIfp8Direct and through OpenRouter✓✓✗
SiliconFlowfp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✗
NextBitfp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Venice AIThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
AtlasCloudfp4Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Relacefp4Through OpenRouter✓✓✗
Microsoft Azure AIusThrough OpenRouter✓✓✗
AtlasCloudfp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Baidufp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Parasailfp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
CoreWeavefp8Through OpenRouter✓✓✓
Together AIThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓
WaferThrough OpenRouter✓✓✓

Tool calling: 26 of 26 listings say yes. JSON output: 26 of 26 listings say yes. Strict schema: 18 of 26 listings say yes, 8 say no.

03

Models people weigh against DeepSeek V4 Pro

04

When we formed this view

Recent changes

Oct 1, 2026Price changeDeepSeek V4 Pro repriced across 3 hosts: Reka input and cache read down 55%, Relace input and cache read up 36%
What movedDeepSeek V4 Pro moved on 3 hosts: Reka: input −55% ($1.30 → $0.58 per 1M tokens), output −33% ($2.60 → $1.74 per 1M tokens), cache read −55% ($0.130 → $0.058 per 1M tokens); Relace: input +36% ($0.123 → $0.167 per 1M tokens), cache read +36% ($0.123 → $0.167 per 1M tokens); Wafer: input +15% ($0.48 → $0.55 per 1M tokens), cache read +15% ($0.384 → $0.440 per 1M tokens)
Sep 30, 2026Price changeDeepSeek V4 Pro repriced across 3 hosts: Relace input and cache read down 18%, Ionstream input up 104%
What movedDeepSeek V4 Pro moved on 3 hosts: Ionstream: input +104% ($0.608 → $1.238 per 1M tokens), output −6% ($1.96 → $1.85 per 1M tokens); Relace: input −18% ($0.150 → $0.123 per 1M tokens), cache read −18% ($0.150 → $0.123 per 1M tokens); Wafer: input −1% ($0.480 → $0.475 per 1M tokens), output −17% ($4.20 → $3.49 per 1M tokens), cache read +24% ($0.38 → $0.47 per 1M tokens)
Sep 29, 2026Price changeDeepSeek V4 Pro repriced across 5 hosts: Relace input down 57%, Ionstream input up 169%
What movedDeepSeek V4 Pro moved on 5 hosts: Ionstream: input +169% ($0.226 → $0.608 per 1M tokens); Relace: input −57% ($0.35 → $0.15 per 1M tokens), cache read +50% ($0.10 → $0.15 per 1M tokens); Io Net: input −29% ($0.99 → $0.70 per 1M tokens), output +11% ($3.15 → $3.50 per 1M tokens), cache read −17% ($0.108 → $0.090 per 1M tokens); GMICloud: input −24% ($1.74 → $1.32 per 1M tokens), output +14% ($3.48 → $3.96 per 1M tokens), cache read −70% ($0.145 → $0.044 per 1M tokens); Wafer: input −0.2% ($0.395 → $0.394 per 1M tokens), output −17% ($4.20 → $3.49 per 1M tokens), cache read −0.2% ($0.316 → $0.315 per 1M tokens)
Sep 28, 2026Price changeDeepSeek V4 Pro repriced across 4 hosts: Io Net input down 11%, Relace input up 72%
What movedDeepSeek V4 Pro moved on 4 hosts: Relace: input +72% ($0.204 → $0.350 per 1M tokens), output −7% ($3.78 → $3.50 per 1M tokens), cache read −51% ($0.203 → $0.100 per 1M tokens); Wafer: input +35% ($0.293 → $0.397 per 1M tokens), output +20% ($3.50 → $4.20 per 1M tokens), cache read +85% ($0.172 → $0.318 per 1M tokens); Io Net: input −11% ($1.24 → $1.10 per 1M tokens), cache read −14% ($0.14 → $0.12 per 1M tokens); Ionstream: input −11% ($0.253 → $0.226 per 1M tokens)
Sep 27, 2026Price changeHost Wafer repriced DeepSeek V4 Pro: input up 20%, cache read down 30%
What movedinput +20% ($0.245 → $0.293 per 1M tokens), cache read −30% ($0.245 → $0.172 per 1M tokens)
Sep 25, 2026Price changeDeepSeek V4 Pro repriced across 2 hosts: Wafer input down 36%, output up 21% · machine-readable source ↗
What movedDeepSeek V4 Pro moved on 2 hosts: Wafer: input −36% ($0.39 → $0.25 per 1M tokens), output +21% ($2.90 → $3.50 per 1M tokens), cache read −0.4% ($0.250 → $0.249 per 1M tokens); Ionstream: input −35% ($0.390 → $0.253 per 1M tokens), output −32% ($2.88 → $1.96 per 1M tokens)
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored −0.011 on Arena Agent
What movedleaderboard
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored 0.024 on Arena Agent · Recovery
What movedleaderboard
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored −0.025 on Arena Agent · Steerability
What movedleaderboard
Sep 25, 2026BenchmarkScored −0.034 on Arena Agent · Task outcome
What movedleaderboard

Each date is the day we first saw the change, or the day the maker announced it.

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 1 of 26 listings does not say whether it trains on prompts, and 2 answer only through OpenRouter, not for their own listing.
  • We hold no batch or off-peak rate for any of its listings.
  • We hold a decode speed for it, but no prompt-processing (prefill) figure, so how long the input side of a job takes is unknown to us.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsMIT License, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

MIT License

Open, few conditionsCommercial use allowed

Fully permissive: do anything with attribution. No patent grant, unlike Apache-2.0.

Identifiers

Architecture
Mixture of experts
Takes in, gives back
Text in, text out
Catalogue slug
deepseek-deepseek-v4-pro

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us