Models / DeepSeek/ DeepSeek V3 0324

DeepSeek V3 0324

DeepSeek · released Mar 24, 2025 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3-0324

Input: text. Output: text.InputOutput
Type
Open weightsMIT License
Params
685B
Context
164K

37B active per word · about 123K words of context

Our take

Written Aug 3, 2026

DeepSeek V3 0324 is a large downloadable text model released in March 2025 with a permissive MIT licence. Its coding score on the independent chat leaderboard is its strongest suit, while its maths and instruction-following scores trail within the same profile.

Who should pick it

Pick this for coding tasks where its leaderboard score peaks, or for research and commercial derivative work that needs a permissive licence. Use it if you want a mixture-of-experts architecture with a large parameter reservoir at mid-tier API prices. Skip it if you need image, video or audio input, or if you want the fastest throughput and are unwilling to pay the premium host.

The case for it

  • Permissive MIT licence allows commercial use, modification and redistribution.
  • Coding performance leads its own skill profile, with a 59-point gap over its maths score on the same leaderboard.
  • Lowest API price is roughly half the highest offer for input, and about two-thirds for output.
  • Highest measured throughput is 88% faster than the slowest tracked host.

The case against it

  • Maths and instruction following lag within its own profile, both at least 30 points below its coding peak.
  • Text-only: no image, video or audio input or output.
  • Throughput is unverified on three of the seven listed providers.
00

How good is it?

IntelligencePuzzles, maths, exam questions

2.5 of 5

Arena Text (overall)78th of 143 · 1395.5

Arena Hard Prompts 83rd of 143Arena Maths 93rd of 139

CodingWriting and fixing code on its own

2.5 of 5

Arena Coding88th of 143 · 1428.7

Arena Coding is the only board that has scored it for this.

AgenticPlanning, calling tools, staying on task

not measured

Nobody we watch has scored DeepSeek V3 0324 for this. We would take the rating from Arena Agent (IPS).

WritingWe do not rate this

Scored, not ratedThe placings are on the right.

Two boards come close and neither tests writing: Arena Creative Writing asks people which of two replies they prefer, and LiveBench Language tests whether a model understood a passage. So we show where DeepSeek V3 0324 placed and give it no mark out of five.

Arena Creative Writing 61st of 143 · 1390.1
Also scored, on boards we give no mark for
Arena Instruction Following 82nd of 143

These tests check whether a model follows instructions — a precondition for all the work above, but not a measure of how well that work is done, which is why they get no rating.

Every published score for this model6 scoresEvery figure we hold, from 6 boards, with who ran it and a link to the source — including the boards no rating above is built on.
1428.7independentsource ↗
1408.6independentsource ↗
1369.6independentsource ↗
1395.5independentsource ↗
01

Can you run it yourself?

Fits in memory
weights load entirely on the card
Spills to system RAM
some weights offload; much slower
Too large
will not load even with offload
est
size is calculated; the verdict could change by 10%
A card many people ownToo large

GeForce RTX 4090 · 24 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M431.6 / 24 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step upToo large

Apple M1 Pro (16-core GPU) · 32 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M431.6 / 32 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

One step downToo large

Radeon RX 7900 XT · 20 GB

Weights at Q4_K_M431.6 / 20 GBest
Usable contextNot calculated for spilled setups
Decode speedNot estimated for spilled setups

Too large for this card. The weights do not fit even with part of them offloaded to system memory.

Your hardware
Checking your profile…

Memory use by level

Against a 24 GB card.

Q4_K_M
recommended
431.6 GBest
Too large
Q5_K_M
506.3 GBest
Too large
Q8_0
756.4 GBest
Too large

All 3 sizes here are calculated, not measured. We hold no measured file for this model, so each size comes from the parameter count and every verdict above inherits that uncertainty.

Check against your own machine → · All 71 devices, with every size →

02

Or rent it from someone else

Cheapest published offer

Cheapest of 7 live listings. Picked at the widest standard context we hold, within one quantisation slice, so the numbers beside it are a price one host actually charges.

per 1M tokens
$0.27 in / $1.12 out
Context served
164K
Throughput
Not measured
Current provider offers with price, context and prompt-privacy answers
ProviderIn / out per 1M tokensContextThroughputTrains on promptsLogs promptsZero retention
DeepInfrafp4$0.24 / $0.90164Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
DeepInfrafp4$0.24 / $0.90164K40 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
SiliconFlowfp8$0.25 / $1.00164K17 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Novita AI$0.27 / $1.12164Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
OpenRouter$0.27 / $1.12164Knot measuredUnknownUnknownUnknown
Novita AIfp8$0.27 / $1.12164K30 tok/sNoNoConfirmed
Crusoebf16$0.50 / $1.50164K33 tok/sNoNoConfirmed

Across the 7 listings we hold: 4 say they do not train on prompts, 0 say they do and 3 do not say. 4 appear in the zero-retention registry we check; the rest are unknown to us rather than confirmed either way.

What each host's API supports

From the parameter list each endpoint publishes. Streaming is omitted: nothing we hold reports it, for any model.

Supported
Not supported
Not published
host gave no parameter list
API features per host
ProviderTool callingJSON outputStrict schema
DeepInfrafp4
DeepInfrafp4
SiliconFlowfp8
Novita AI
OpenRouter
Novita AIfp8
Crusoebf16

Tool calling: 4 of 7 listings say yes, 1 says no, 2 publish no parameter list. JSON output: 4 of 7 listings say yes, 1 says no, 2 publish no parameter list. Strict schema: 4 of 7 listings say yes, 1 says no, 2 publish no parameter list.

03

Models people weigh against DeepSeek V3 0324

04

When we formed this view

Dates behind this page

Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1428.7 on Arena Codingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1390.1 on Arena Creative Writingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1408.6 on Arena Hard Promptsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1378.8 on Arena Instruction Followingleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1369.6 on Arena Mathsleaderboard
Aug 2, 2026BenchmarkScored 1395.5 on Arena Text (overall)leaderboard
Jul 26, 2026ListedListed on LLMapfirst indexed by our pipeline
Mar 24, 2025AnnouncedDeepSeek V3 0324 announced by DeepSeek

Prices last checked 5h ago

What we do not know about this model yet

  • We hold no measured file for it, so all 3 sizes on this page are calculated from the parameter count.
  • 2 of 7 listings publish no parameter list, so what their API accepts is unknown to us.
  • Nothing we hold says whether an endpoint streams, so we do not show it either way.
  • 3 of 7 listings do not say whether they train on prompts.
05

Licence and identifiers

What the licence allowsMIT License, what it allows commercially, and the identifiers you need to pull this model — its Hugging Face repo, our slug and a machine-readable card.

Licence

MIT License

permissiveCommercial use allowed

Fully permissive: do anything with attribution. No patent grant, unlike Apache-2.0.

Identifiers

Architecture
Mixture of experts
Modality record
text->text
Catalogue slug
deepseek-deepseek-v3-0324

Machine-readable model card (omc.json) →

Something wrong on this page? Tell us